Skip to content
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Tools
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status
  • AI Site Map

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
Favicon for openai

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra

openai/gpt-5.6-terra

Compare

GPT-5.6 Terra is a balanced model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series, positioned between the flagship Sol tier and the cost-efficient Luna tier. It is suited for everyday coding, reasoning, and agentic tasks where capability and cost need to be balanced, offering strong performance at roughly half the cost of Sol.

Modalities
In / Out Price
$2 / $12per 1M
Context
1.1M
Released
Jul 9, 2026
Knowledge Cutoff
Feb 2026
Compare
ProvidersPricingPerformanceUptimeBenchmarksAppsActivityDocumentationFAQExplore

Providers

Different companies host the same model. OpenRouter routes your request to one of them based on the routing mode you pick — Balanced (price + speed), Nitro (fastest), Floor (cheapest), or Exacto (highest tool-calling accuracy).

Pricing

The average price customers actually pay for this model, next to the prices providers post. Caching and discounts mean the price actually paid is often well below the listed one.

Performance

Throughput is how fast the model writes (tokens per second — higher is better). Latency is total round-trip time (lower is better). TTFT is time-to-first-token — how long before you see anything appear (lower is better).

Uptime

Uptime is the percentage of the past 3 days that at least one provider was responding to requests. Availability is the percentage of time that inference was successfully served. OpenRouter continuously monitors and uses the next-best provider when one returns an error.

Benchmarks

Scores on standardized evaluations and this model’s own outputs on shared benchmark prompts. Higher percentages are better — and each rank shows where this model lands among the models evaluated on that source.

Benchmark score summary for OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (Artificial Analysis and Vals AI)
SourceBenchmarkScore
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Low) Intelligence Index27.5
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Low) Coding Index58.1
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Low) Agentic Index25.9
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Low) GPQA Diamond84.3%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Low) HLE29.2%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Low) IFBench59.7%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Low) τ²-Bench Telecom60.5%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Low) AA-LCR71.3%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Low) τ-Bench Banking18.8%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Low) GDPval-AA30.5%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Low) CritPt9.4%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Low) SciCode49.9%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Low) Terminal-Bench Hard43.9%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Low) Terminal-Bench 4.01.5%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Low) Terminal-Bench 2.162.5%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Low) AA-Omniscience Accuracy43.7%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Low) AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate10.1%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) Intelligence Index30.1
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) Coding Index64.7
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) Agentic Index30.4
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) GPQA Diamond87.2%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) HLE33.3%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) IFBench62.2%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) τ²-Bench Telecom72.8%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) AA-LCR74.0%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) τ-Bench Banking25.6%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) GDPval-AA38.5%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) CritPt17.4%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) SciCode50.5%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) Terminal-Bench 4.01.0%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) Terminal-Bench 2.172.3%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) AA-Omniscience Accuracy44.6%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate10.2%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Max) Intelligence Index42.1
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Max) Coding Index76.7
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Max) Agentic Index43.2
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Max) GPQA Diamond92.5%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Max) HLE42.9%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Max) IFBench71.2%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Max) τ²-Bench Telecom86.3%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Max) AA-LCR83.0%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Max) τ-Bench Banking40.2%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Max) GDPval-AA47.7%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Max) CritPt30.0%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Max) SciCode55.0%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Max) Terminal-Bench Hard57.6%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Max) Terminal-Bench 4.035.4%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Max) Terminal-Bench 2.188.0%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Max) AA-Omniscience Accuracy46.8%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Max) AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate12.1%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) Intelligence Index38.0
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) Coding Index70.6
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) Agentic Index41.4
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) GPQA Diamond90.8%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) HLE41.9%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) IFBench66.3%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) τ²-Bench Telecom80.4%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) AA-LCR79.0%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) τ-Bench Banking29.7%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) GDPval-AA47.5%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) CritPt27.1%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) SciCode52.3%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) Terminal-Bench Hard62.9%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) Terminal-Bench 4.010.1%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) Terminal-Bench 2.180.1%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) AA-Omniscience Accuracy45.5%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate11.0%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (High) Intelligence Index34.2
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (High) Coding Index67.1
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (High) Agentic Index36.7
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (High) GPQA Diamond89.6%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (High) HLE38.5%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (High) IFBench64.4%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (High) τ²-Bench Telecom78.4%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (High) AA-LCR77.7%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (High) τ-Bench Banking28.7%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (High) GDPval-AA43.9%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (High) CritPt22.9%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (High) SciCode52.4%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (High) Terminal-Bench Hard57.6%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (High) Terminal-Bench 4.01.5%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (High) Terminal-Bench 2.175.7%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (High) AA-Omniscience Accuracy45.5%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (High) AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate10.2%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) Intelligence Index20.8
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) Coding Index52.3
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) Agentic Index23.5
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) GPQA Diamond74.6%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) HLE11.4%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) AA-LCR58.7%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) τ-Bench Banking15.7%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) GDPval-AA30.0%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) CritPt2.0%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) SciCode45.1%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) Terminal-Bench 4.00.5%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) Terminal-Bench 2.156.2%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) AA-Omniscience Accuracy36.8%
Artificial AnalysisGPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate5.0%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra Code Migration47.8%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra CorpFin v265.3%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra CyberBench v1.172.1%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra EMB66.2%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra Finance Agent (v2)54.4%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra GPQA Diamond90.9%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark0.8%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra IOI87.6%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra LiveCodeBench85.9%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra LegalBench85.1%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra Legal Research Bench41.3%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra MedCode43.4%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra MedScribe82.9%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra MMLU Pro86.7%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra MMMU Pro86.5%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra MortgageTax67.3%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra ProgramBench0.5%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra ProofBench v1.174.0%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra SAGE47.0%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra SkillsBench58.9%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra SWE-bench95.4%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra Tax Agent Bench65.2%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra TaxEval v276.2%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra Terminal-Bench 4.022.7%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra Vals Index53.1%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra Vals Multimodal Index65.1%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra Vibe Code Bench 1-10014.8%
Vals AIGPT-5.6 Terra Vibe Code Bench v1.174.6%

Apps

Public apps that send the most traffic to this model. Good signal for what real production workloads look like — and a hint at which use cases this model is best suited for.

Activity

Token volume and request traffic to this model over time.

API

Drop-in code to call this model. OpenRouter's API is OpenAI-compatible — most SDKs work by just swapping the base URL. The only thing that changes between models is the model slug below.

Documentation

Guides, cookbooks, and tools for building with OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra on OpenRouter.

  • GPT-5.6 Migration GuideCookbook

Explore more models

AI Models with Vision: Multimodal LLMs for Image UnderstandingCollectionAI Model RankingsRanking
$2.00$12.00$0.202.63s76 tps
100.00%
$2.00$12.00$0.202.68s65 tps
100.00%
Not used in Standard routing:Why these endpoints are not used
Flex
$1.00$6.00$0.102.33s102 tps
99.69%
$2.20$13.20$0.222.75s60 tps
100.00%
$2.20$13.20$0.221.19s80 tps
--
$2.20$13.20$0.221.81s76 tps
100.00%
Fast
$4.00$24.00$0.401.09s87 tps
100.00%
Throughput
102tok/s

P50, best across providers

Latency
1.08s

P50, best provider

AutoExacto benchmarks
GPQA DiamondTAU-BenchAzure (US)88.9%72.7%Azure90.7%70.7%auto-routing88.4%72.7%OpenAI88.9%71.7%Amazon Bedrock90.4%70.0%Azure (EU)89.2%70.0%
Uptime (3d)The model was reachable. Request routed to a provider.
100.00%
Availability (3d)The model returned inference from any provider. Errors and empty responses count against it.
99.48%

Availability over the last 3 days

Last 72 hours
Availability 99.48%
3 Days Ago2 Days AgoYesterdayNow

Availability over the last 24 hours

OpenRouter Availability
99.71%
Without Routing
98.24%

When an error occurs in an upstream provider, we can recover by routing to another healthy provider, if your request filters allow it. You can access per-provider uptime data programmatically through the Endpoints API. Learn more about our load balancing and customization options.

1.
Favicon for https://www.framer.com/
Framer
Create a professional website with Framer’s no-code AI website builder. Design freely, manage CMS content, optimize SEO, collaborate, and publish fast.
702Btokens
2.
Favicon for https://openai.com/codex
Codex
A coding agent that helps you build and ship with AI
103Btokens
3.
Favicon for https://nousresearch.com
Hermes Agent
Hermes Agent is an open-source, self-improving AI agent by Nous Research that runs persistently with memory across sessions, and builds reusable skills from experience. It comes with 40+ built-in tools, including web search, browser automation, and vision, plus scheduled automations and subagents.
82.3Btokens
4.
Favicon for https://oneportai.com/
Oneport-Agent
new
67.8Btokens
5.
Favicon for https://pi.dev/
pi
There are many coding agents, but this one is yours.
22.5Btokens

Frequently asked questions

GPT-5.6 Terra is a balanced model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series, positioned between the flagship Sol tier and the cost-efficient Luna tier. It is suited for everyday coding, reasoning, and agentic tasks where capability and cost need to be balanced, offering strong performance at roughly half the cost of Sol.

The GPT-5.6 Terra documentation on OpenRouter includes the GPT-5.6 Migration Guide cookbook. The quickstart covers API keys and your first request, and the API reference lists every parameter.

GPT-5.6 Terra costs $2.00/M input tokens and $12.00/M output tokens, with separate rates for Cache Read at $0.20/M tokens, Cache Write at $2.50/M tokens, and Web Search at $10.00/1K calls.

GPT-5.6 Terra has a 1,050,000 token context window. It supports up to 128,000 completion tokens.

Yes. GPT-5.6 Terra accepts tools and tool_choice for function calling. It also supports structured outputs via a JSON schema in response_format.

Yes. OpenAI caches prompts of 1024 tokens or more automatically, and GPT-5.6 Terra bills a cache write on each cached prompt whether or not the cached prefix is read again. To turn caching off for a request, set prompt_cache_options.mode to "explicit" at the request root and do not mark any content block with prompt_cache_breakpoint. Explicit mode disables OpenAI-managed breakpoints, so a request with none of your own has no cacheable prefix and is billed at the plain input rate. See the prompt caching guide.

GPT-5.6 Terra accepts files such as PDFs, images, and text as input and returns text.

GPT-5.6 Terra is served by 3 providers on OpenRouter: OpenAI, Azure, and Amazon Bedrock. Requests are routed to the best available provider, with automatic failover to the others, and you can pin or exclude providers with provider routing.

GPT-5.6 Terra was released on July 9, 2026. Its knowledge cutoff is February 16, 2026.

More models from OpenAI

GPT-6.1 Sol Pro

GPT-6.1 Sol Pro is the same underlying model as GPT-6.1 Sol, served with reasoning.mode set to pro for higher-quality responses on complex tasks.

Cost note: pro mode spends far more reasoning tokens per request, so a typical request costs several times more than the same request on GPT-6.1 Sol and takes much longer to complete. It is intended for hard, high-stakes problems where the extra accuracy justifies the cost. For everyday coding, agentic, and chat workloads, use GPT-6.1 Sol instead.

Learn more in OpenAI's docs: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/reasoning#reasoning-mode

Text1.1M context$2 / $10
GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol is an upgrade to GPT-6 Sol from OpenAI, positioned below the flagship GPT-6 Astra in the GPT-6 series. It is suited for agentic coding, computer use, document-heavy professional work, and multi-step business workflow automation, and approaches Astra-level results on these tasks at a much lower cost. Compared with GPT-6 Sol, it makes fewer factual errors and is more reliable at respecting explicit restrictions and user intent during agentic tasks.

Text1.1M context$2 / $10
GPT-6 Luna Pro

GPT-6 Luna Pro is the same underlying model as GPT-6 Luna, served with reasoning.mode set to pro for higher-quality responses on complex tasks.

Cost note: pro mode spends far more reasoning tokens per request, so a typical request costs several times more than the same request on GPT-6 Luna and takes much longer to complete. It is intended for hard, high-stakes problems where the extra accuracy justifies the cost. For everyday coding, agentic, and chat workloads, use GPT-6 Luna instead.

Learn more in OpenAI's docs: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/reasoning#reasoning-mode

Text1.1M context$0.10 / $0.50
GPT-6 Luna Pro

GPT-6 Luna Pro is the same underlying model as GPT-6 Luna, served with reasoning.mode set to pro for higher-quality responses on complex tasks.

Cost note: pro mode spends far more reasoning tokens per request, so a typical request costs several times more than the same request on GPT-6 Luna and takes much longer to complete. It is intended for hard, high-stakes problems where the extra accuracy justifies the cost. For everyday coding, agentic, and chat workloads, use GPT-6 Luna instead.

Learn more in OpenAI's docs: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/reasoning#reasoning-mode

Text1.1M context$0.05 / $0.25
GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna is the fast, cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-6 series, positioned below GPT-6 Sol. It is suited for high-volume and latency-sensitive workloads such as chat, classification, and lightweight agentic tasks, and at higher reasoning effort it can take on complex software engineering and computer-use tasks that previously called for a Sol-tier model. It shares the GPT-6 family's gains in factual reliability and its clearer, more concise communication style.

Text1.1M context$0.10 / $0.50
GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna is the fast, cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-6 series, positioned below GPT-6 Sol. It is suited for high-volume and latency-sensitive workloads such as chat, classification, and lightweight agentic tasks, and at higher reasoning effort it can take on complex software engineering and computer-use tasks that previously called for a Sol-tier model. It shares the GPT-6 family's gains in factual reliability and its clearer, more concise communication style.

Text1.1M context$0.05 / $0.25
GPT-6 Sol Pro

GPT-6 Sol Pro is the same underlying model as GPT-6 Sol, served with reasoning.mode set to pro for higher-quality responses on complex tasks.

Cost note: pro mode spends far more reasoning tokens per request, so a typical request costs several times more than the same request on GPT-6 Sol and takes much longer to complete. It is intended for hard, high-stakes problems where the extra accuracy justifies the cost. For everyday coding, agentic, and chat workloads, use GPT-6 Sol instead.

Learn more in OpenAI's docs: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/reasoning#reasoning-mode

Text1.1M context$2 / $10
GPT-6 Sol Pro

GPT-6 Sol Pro is the same underlying model as GPT-6 Sol, served with reasoning.mode set to pro for higher-quality responses on complex tasks.

Cost note: pro mode spends far more reasoning tokens per request, so a typical request costs several times more than the same request on GPT-6 Sol and takes much longer to complete. It is intended for hard, high-stakes problems where the extra accuracy justifies the cost. For everyday coding, agentic, and chat workloads, use GPT-6 Sol instead.

Learn more in OpenAI's docs: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/reasoning#reasoning-mode

Text1.1M context$1 / $5
GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol is the cost-efficient high-end model in OpenAI's GPT-6 series, positioned below the flagship GPT-6 Astra and above the fast GPT-6 Luna tier. It is suited for demanding professional work, agentic coding, business workflow automation, and computer use, and is particularly strong at long-horizon software engineering tasks in real codebases. It approaches Astra-level factual reliability at a much lower cost and shares Astra's clearer, more concise communication style in technical and coding conversations.

Text1.1M context$2 / $10
GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol is the cost-efficient high-end model in OpenAI's GPT-6 series, positioned below the flagship GPT-6 Astra and above the fast GPT-6 Luna tier. It is suited for demanding professional work, agentic coding, business workflow automation, and computer use, and is particularly strong at long-horizon software engineering tasks in real codebases. It approaches Astra-level factual reliability at a much lower cost and shares Astra's clearer, more concise communication style in technical and coding conversations.

Text1.1M context$1 / $5
GPT Astra Latest

This model always redirects to the latest model in the GPT Astra family.

Text1.1M context
GPT Sol Latest

This model always redirects to the latest model in the GPT Sol family.

Text1.1M context
GPT Terra Latest

This model always redirects to the latest model in the GPT Terra family.

Text1.1M context
GPT Luna Latest

This model always redirects to the latest model in the GPT Luna family.

Text1.1M context
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst is an image generation and editing model from OpenAI, positioned as the precision-oriented tier of the GPT Image 2.5 series. It is suited to detailed creative work where editing accuracy matters more than generation speed, via the dedicated Images API.

Image$8 / $30
GPT Image 2.5 Flare

GPT Image 2.5 Flare is an image generation and editing model from OpenAI, positioned as the speed-oriented tier of the GPT Image 2.5 series. It is suited to high-volume everyday generation, creator content, and rapid prototyping via the dedicated Images API.

Image$8 / $30
GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra is OpenAI's flagship model for demanding end-to-end work. It is suited for advanced analysis, software engineering, deep research, scientific work, and document creation, with particular strengths in long-horizon agentic tasks that involve computer and browser use.

Text1.1M context$10 / $50
GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra is OpenAI's flagship model for demanding end-to-end work. It is suited for advanced analysis, software engineering, deep research, scientific work, and document creation, with particular strengths in long-horizon agentic tasks that involve computer and browser use.

Text1.1M context$5 / $25
GPT-6 Astra Pro

GPT-6 Astra Pro is the same underlying model as GPT-6 Astra, served with reasoning.mode set to pro for higher-quality responses on complex tasks.

Cost note: pro mode spends far more reasoning tokens per request, so a typical request costs several times more than the same request on GPT-6 Astra and takes much longer to complete. It is intended for hard, high-stakes problems where the extra accuracy justifies the cost. For everyday coding, agentic, and chat workloads, use GPT-6 Astra instead.

Learn more in OpenAI's docs: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/reasoning#reasoning-mode

Text1.1M context$10 / $50
GPT-6 Astra Pro

GPT-6 Astra Pro is the same underlying model as GPT-6 Astra, served with reasoning.mode set to pro for higher-quality responses on complex tasks.

Cost note: pro mode spends far more reasoning tokens per request, so a typical request costs several times more than the same request on GPT-6 Astra and takes much longer to complete. It is intended for hard, high-stakes problems where the extra accuracy justifies the cost. For everyday coding, agentic, and chat workloads, use GPT-6 Astra instead.

Learn more in OpenAI's docs: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/reasoning#reasoning-mode

Text1.1M context$5 / $25